Title: Why is Xalan for C++ slower than the Java version?

Hello,

I was wondering if someone of the developers can tell me
why the Xalan for Java performs better in the benchmarks
than the C++ version.  Aren't the algorithms pretty much
the same?  Shouldn't the C++ version perform better than
the Java version then?  The benchmarks don't compare the
same versions of Xalan, so are the newer versions just
implemented more efficiently?

thanks
    Heiko

Reply via email to