Hello,
I was wondering if someone of the developers can tell me
why the Xalan for Java performs better in the benchmarks
than the C++ version. Aren't the algorithms pretty much
the same? Shouldn't the C++ version perform better than
the Java version then? The benchmarks don't compare the
same versions of Xalan, so are the newer versions just
implemented more efficiently?
thanks
Heiko
Title: Why is Xalan for C++ slower than the Java version?
- Re: Why is Xalan for C++ slower than the Java version? Weber, Heiko
- Re: Why is Xalan for C++ slower than the Java version... David_N_Bertoni
- RE: Why is Xalan for C++ slower than the Java version... Weber, Heiko
- RE: Why is Xalan for C++ slower than the Java version... David_N_Bertoni
- RE: Why is Xalan for C++ slower than the Java version... jjborie
- RE: Why is Xalan for C++ slower than the Java version... jjborie
- RE: Why is Xalan for C++ slower than the Java version... David_N_Bertoni
