Hello Dave, I found the following two benchmarks: http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2001/03/28/xsltmark/results.html http://www.tfi-technology.com/xml/xslbench.html Both claim the Java version to be faster than the C++ version, but both used older C++ versions than Java versions. How did the C++ version perform in your tests? I had expected the C++ version to be much faster than the Java version, so I was really surprised by these results. thanks, Heiko -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tue 19.06.2001 17:11 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: Re: Why is Xalan for C++ slower than the Java version? To which benchmarks are you referring? Our testing shows Xalan-C++ to be generally faster than the Java version. Dave
<<winmail.dat>>
