Nope, the -instances=static is a gcc anachronism.
Glad to be of service...
Dave
"Scott Russell"
<scott@activest To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
udios.com> cc: (bcc: David N Bertoni/CAM/Lotus)
Subject: RE: Missing util/XML4CDefs.hpp
from archived sources
08/30/2001
02:16 PM
Please respond
to xalan-dev
Nope, it compained about missing Makefile.ins in the child
directories. So I just untarred it again and did a runConfig -
worked fine, except I had to remove -instances=static form the
makefile.
Is that going to bite me when this compile finishes?
By the way, thanks for the help!
-- Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 12:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Missing util/XML4CDefs.hpp from archived sources
Xerces recommends using autoconf, etc? That's news to me -- they have the
same build process that we have, since we ripped of theirs to create ours
(hence the appearance of util/XML4CDefs.hpp). You should be able to use
their runConfigure script, unless you're adding a new platform.
At any rate, did changing that line of configure.in work?
Dave
- Re: Missing util/XML4CDefs.hpp from archived sources David_N_Bertoni
- RE: Missing util/XML4CDefs.hpp from archived sources Brian Quinlan
- RE: Missing util/XML4CDefs.hpp from archived sources Scott Russell
- RE: Missing util/XML4CDefs.hpp from archived sour... Scott Russell
- RE: Missing util/XML4CDefs.hpp from archived sources David_N_Bertoni
- RE: Missing util/XML4CDefs.hpp from archived sour... Scott Russell
- RE: Missing util/XML4CDefs.hpp from archived sources David_N_Bertoni
- RE: Missing util/XML4CDefs.hpp from archived sour... Scott Russell
- RE: Missing util/XML4CDefs.hpp from archived sour... Scott Russell
- RE: Missing util/XML4CDefs.hpp from archived sources David_N_Bertoni
- RE: Missing util/XML4CDefs.hpp from archived sources David_N_Bertoni
- RE: Missing util/XML4CDefs.hpp from archived sources Scott Russell
- RE: Missing util/XML4CDefs.hpp from archived sour... Scott Russell
