Hi John,
thanks for the pointer! I did post another patch
as an attachment to an existing bug, but I guess
it makes sense to create a new bug if there isn't
already one exactly matching the patch, so that
it doesn't slip out of the committers' span of
attention. I have now done that for these last
two patches.
Cheers,
- Gulli
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Howard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 4. september 2001 17:31
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] fixed imports/includes mixup
>
>
> Hi Gulli!
>
> I'm a fellow xsltc contributor - the kind that doesn't have commit
> priviliges.
>
> Right now I think a couple of the commiters are on vacation so your
> mailing-list posted patch might get lost (I went away for 2 weeks in August
> and had ~700 posts to sort through). My experience is that if you post the
> patches to bugzilla with an explanation of what problems they address they
> wont get lost!
>
> cheers,
>
> john
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Gunnlaugur Thor Briem [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001 8:15 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [PATCH] fixed imports/includes mixup
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > the attached patch corrects a mixed-up argument
> > order when calling SourceLoader.loadSource from
> > Import and Include classes in XSLTC. The base
> > and href arguments were swapped. This may fix
> > some of the imports/includes bugs filed against
> > XSLTC on nagoya.apache.org, but I don't know,
> > I haven't run those tests.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > - Gulli
> >
> >
> >
> > ---
> > Gunnlaugur Thor Briem at Dimon Software
> >
> > "A person without a sense of humor is like
> > a wagon without springs -- jolted by every
> > pebble in the road." - Henry Ward Beecher
> >
