DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6463>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6463 Severe Performance problems (Memory + Time taken) compared to SAXON ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-02-18 17:24 ------- In a quick test with the code delta that I have on my laptop (redundant expression elimination, serialization improvements), I get 3595 msecs with Saxon, vs. 5638 msecs with my version of XalanJ. This is pretty consistent with what I've been seeing in other tests. Since XalanJ is outputting more characters to System.out that Saxon, the difference may be even lower. Probably the remaining difference can be accounted for by a combination of instrumentation state tracking (which I'm currently working at reducing in a big way), and perhaps some RTF/DTM overhead.
