Hi Per,
I don't know why 2.95.3. wouldn't work. I think I have a copy on my
machine, so I'll give it a shot. Can you give more details about the
error?
By the way, you'll need to add -fno-elide-constructors as a compiler
option to the Makefile, if you're not using the latest CVS. gcc 3.2 and
above implement the return value optimization, which is messing up Xalan's
reference counting mechanism.
Dave
Per Jessen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
g> cc: (bcc: David N
Bertoni/Cambridge/IBM)
Sent by: news Subject: xalanc - gcc 3.x required ?
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.org>
02/05/2003 02:46
AM
Please respond
to xalan-dev
Hi,
I just remembered that when I built from a recent CVS snapshot last week, I
had to use gcc3 - my 2.95.3 (SuSE)
complained about something or other. I built with gcc3.2.1 instead - no
probs.
I'll check this later today, but if gcc3 /is/ a requirement, shouldn't the
config be updated to check for it?
thanks,
Per Jessen, Zurich
- xalanc - gcc 3.x required ? Per Jessen
- Re: xalanc - gcc 3.x required ? Per Jessen
- Re: xalanc - gcc 3.x required ? David N Bertoni/Cambridge/IBM
- Re: xalanc - gcc 3.x required ? Per Jessen
- Re: xalanc - gcc 3.x requir... David N Bertoni/Cambridge/IBM
- Re: xalanc - gcc 3.x r... Per Jessen
- Re: xalanc - gcc 3.x required ? David N Bertoni/Cambridge/IBM
- Re: xalanc - gcc 3.x required ? Per Jessen
- Re: Re: xalanc - gcc 3.x required ? berin
- Re: Re: xalanc - gcc 3.x required ? David N Bertoni/Cambridge/IBM
