Re: Re: xalanc - gcc 3.x required ?

[David N Bertoni/Cambridge/IBM]

Hi Berin,

Excellent!  By the way, your commit access is set, so give it try...

Dave



                                                                                       
                                                 
                      <[EMAIL PROTECTED]                                                 
                                                 
                      om.au>                   To:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]       
                                                 
                                               cc:      (bcc: David N 
Bertoni/Cambridge/IBM)                                            
                      02/11/2003 02:55         Subject: Re: Re: xalanc - gcc 3.x 
required ?                                             
                      PM                                                               
                                                 
                      Please respond                                                   
                                                 
                      to xalan-dev                                                     
                                                 
                                                                                       
                                                 



Per,

And I have now taken it on as a personal mission
in life to try to get at least a basic level of
auto-detection in auto-conf for the version after
1.5.....

Cheers,
    Berin

>
> From: Per Jessen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: xalanc - gcc 3.x required ?
> Date: 11/02/2003 21:23:52
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> David N Bertoni/Cambridge/IBM wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi Per,
> >
> > No, I got the same problem you got.  But someone reported you can build
if
> > you remove -fno-elide-constructors, which isn't necessary with 2.95.3
> > anyway.  Weird...
> >
> > Try it and let us know what happens.
>
> Yep, it builds just fine with gcc2.95.3 without -fno-elide-constructors
... very odd.
> Anyway, I've pretty much switched to gcc3.2.1 but as Berin suggested
earlier, having
> autoconf check for it is probably the way to go.
>
>
> /Per
>
>
>

This message was sent through MyMail http://www.mymail.com.au