Hello Henry, some Oracle/Sun engineers are about to raise the priority of the corresponding JDK bug 6689809 and JAXP issue 60 of XALANJ-2438. They try to get my patch into the next Oracle JDK version. Therefore please check and confirm my result first, that my patch do not alter any of the 1762 output files of the exhausting Xalan XSLT test suite. Please post your results here or append it to any of the issue entries. Thanks!
Oracle/Sun has fixed 15 XSLT issues in the January 2010 release of JAXP (Version 1.4.3). See: <http://jaxp.dev.java.net/1.4/1.4.3/changelog.html> Which of these issues are already fixed in the current Xalan-J Subversion version? Has Oracle/Sun submitted patches for these issues to the Xalan-J project? There are also 25 tests in the JAXP test suite, which are failing with the current Xalan-J Subversion version. So there seems to exists 25 additional XSLTC bug fixes applied to the JDK Xalan-J version (see uploaded test result output in issue XALANJ-2438). Who is willing to analyze the failing tests? Regards, Helge -- Helge Schulz - http://OpenSHORE.org On 02/04/10 23:26, Henry Zongaro wrote: > > Hi, Helge. > > Helge Schulz wrote on 02/04/2010 04:38:27 PM: >> >> I contributed two patches to the Xalan-J project in March 2008 and I >> hopefully have fulfilled any requirements requested by comments to the >> JIRA issues. But now there seems to be no active project member anymore >> to review new versions of my patches. What can I do? >> >> Please take a look at the following JIRA issues: >> >> <http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XALANJ-2438> >> <http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XALANJ-2439> > > Let me give you a belated "Thank you" for your contributions, and my > apologies for the lack of action on submitted patches. I have been > trying the past few months to spend a little bit more time on this > project than I've been able to for the past couple of years - recent > project pressures at work have eased a bit. I do plan to look at your > recent revised patch for XALANJ-2438 - I should be able to make some > time within the next two weeks. > > As for XALANJ-2439, I looked at your patch earlier this week, and it > seems reasonable, but I'm still a bit worried about it - I'm trying to > see whether I can come up with a scenario where it would release the DTM > representation of the result-tree fragment prematurely. Again, I will > try to act on this one within the next two weeks. > > Thanks, > > Henry > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > Henry Zongaro > XML Transformation & Query Development > IBM Canada Lab T/L 313-6044; Phone +1 905 413-6044 > mailto:zong...@ca.ibm.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: xalan-dev-unsubscr...@xml.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: xalan-dev-h...@xml.apache.org
