On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 12:02 AM, Michael Glavassevich <mrgla...@ca.ibm.com> wrote: > Tim Williams <william...@gmail.com> wrote on 07/06/2011 11:20:18 PM: > >> On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 10:45 PM, Steve Hathaway <shath...@e-z.net> wrote: >> > Tim, >> > >> > The patch for XALANC-570 appears to be trivial. According to C++ >> > language >> > standards, overloaded operators should have return statements. I need >> > to >> > review if any of the referenced members have a return type other than >> > void, >> > then resolve the differences according to C++ specifications. >> > >> > I plan to make a proper patch for this issue and others. I hope to get >> > the >> > easy and necessary patches committed to the svn xalan/c/trunk in the >> > near >> > future. >> >> It does seem pretty simple, which is what led me to question about a >> proper patch. If there is one, I'm happy to review and apply it. > > Are we (i.e. new PMC members) able to do that? Just tried to do a commit to > see if it would work but got an error message. Have a feeling that none of > the new PMC members have write access (yet).
No, I think David needs to add us to the appropriate group (e.g. modify_committee.pl, modify_unix_group.pl). If David doesn't get around to it soon, since we're all already on people@, I reckon it'd be fair to ask for some help from infra@ - I'm happy to do that if it sounds appropriate? Thanks, --tim --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: xalan-dev-unsubscr...@xml.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: xalan-dev-h...@xml.apache.org
