To clarify a bit, dojo has some supporting files that are html and css only, no code. These do not have any license headers, although they are clearly part of the dojo codebase.
I don't think it makes sense for us to slap on an Apache license, nor does it make sense to slap on a dojo license. It seems to me that if dojo can distribute these files without a license header that we should as well? James Margaris -----Original Message----- From: Bob Buffone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 3:53 PM To: [email protected] Subject: XAP 0.3.0 Release Candidate Vote Thanks for the work over the last week to get the release together and fix all the issues that were found. One thing to note: RAT has been run on all source files and any license issue related to XAP has been fixed. Robert, thanks for looking at the licensing and introducing the RAT tool it was a big help. Some template files (.html and .css) under Dojo don't have a license and don't in the Dojo repository. I have posted a release candidate at: http://people.apache.org/~bbuffone/xap-release/ Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache XAP 0.3.0. The vote is open for the next 72 hours, and passes if at least three +1 votes are cast. Then the Apache Incubator must vote to allow this release. For more information on the voting process, please review http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes. [ ] +1 Release the packages as Apache XAP 0.3.0 [ ] -1 Do not release the packages because... Here is my +1 Bob (Buffone)
