Just tried this release candidate. Here are the questions:

1. There is a "samples" directory under "source" directory. There is
also a "samples" directory who is a sibling of "source" directory. The
content of these two "samples" directories are very similar. Is there a
particular reason for this?

2. There is still a "NOTICE.TXT" file under "source" directory that
attributes credit and copyright to ROLLER project. Any thought?



> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bob Buffone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 3:53 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: XAP 0.3.0 Release Candidate Vote
> 
> Thanks for the work over the last week to get the release together and
> fix all the issues that were found.
> 
> One thing to note:  RAT has been run on all source files and any
license
> issue related to XAP has been fixed.  Robert, thanks for looking at
the
> licensing and introducing the RAT tool it was a big help. Some
template
> files (.html and .css) under Dojo don't have a license and don't in
the
> Dojo repository.
> 
> I have posted a release candidate at:
> http://people.apache.org/~bbuffone/xap-release/
> 
> Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache XAP 0.3.0.
> 
> The vote is open for the next 72 hours, and passes if at least three
> +1 votes are cast.  Then the Apache Incubator must vote to allow this
> release.  For more information on the voting process, please review
> http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes.
> 
> [ ] +1 Release the packages as Apache XAP 0.3.0 [ ] -1 Do not release
> the packages because...
> 
> Here is my +1
> 
> Bob (Buffone)

Reply via email to