On 3/21/07, James Margaris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

He has submitted Jira patches in the past and this one will be submitted
as well.

I was under the impression that Jira patches did not need CLAs filed.
Isn't the process supposed to be that people file patches and we patch
them into the repository?

Michael Mikhaylov has submitted patches for:

XAP-314
XAP-333
XAP-318


Interesting. I wonder if there is a problem with JIRA. I searched for his
name in JIRA, and it came back with only XAP-314, which is the only one
Google finds too. Looking at the other issues you list does show his name,
so it's strange that a search doesn't find them.

Carlos Sanchez recently submitted a Maven patch that I or someone else
will hopefully take a look at and commit soon. Have you heard of Carlos
Sanchez before? I haven't but I appreciate the work that he did.


If it's the same Carlos Sanchez, I believe he is a committer on the Maven
project.

More up-front communication about what people are working on would be
good but I don't see why the lack of that would rule out patching in the
code that they wrote and submitted to Jira.

If I have some fundamental misunderstanding of how this works please let
me know, but I thought that Jira contributors did not need CLAs filed.


At some level, it becomes a judgement call, but the default should be that a
CLA is required. To quote from the CLA section on this page:

http://www.apache.org/licenses/

"The ASF desires that all contributors of ideas, code, or documentation to
the Apache projects complete, sign, and submit [a CLA]"

Many projects tend to let this slide for minor bug fixes and patches (which
is where the judgement call comes in), but for anything more than that, we
should really be getting a CLA, for legal protection reasons. I brought it
up here because you mentioned that 95% of what seemed to me likely to be a
significant commit was coming from someone who has not previously file a
CLA.

--
Martin Cooper


James M





-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Martin Cooper
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 6:53 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Optmizations

On 3/21/07, James Margaris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Tonight I am going to check in some optimizations that Michael
> Mikhaylov and I have been working on. (95% Michael, 5% me)


Since 95% of this is coming from someone else, and he's not a committer,
we're going to need him to file a CLA first. Please have him fax one in,
and hold off on your commit until it has been received by the ASF
secretary.

Who is this Michael Mikhaylov? I haven't seen his name in relation to
XAP anywhere before. If he's working on XAP, he should be on the lists,
and we should be seeing the discussions of the work he's doing right
here on the xap-dev list.

Remember, this is a community project, not a stealth development with a
public face.

--
Martin Cooper


These optimizations are
> geared around reducing startup time. The main optimization involves
> some changes to our use of dojo.connectEvent - calling it less
> frequently and changing the connect code itself a bit as well.
>
> Recently Michael Turyn checked in dojo 0.4, which also makes some
> performance improvements as well as fixing the behavior of some
> components. For example the tabbed pane response time is now a lot
> snappier when clicking on various tabs, and some operations like
> scrolling a large table inside of a tabbed pane are an order of
> magnitude faster.
>
> So hopefully people will start seeing a fairly significant speedup.
>
> James Margaris
>

Reply via email to