On Wed, 23 Jun 2010, Scott Evans wrote:
I'm fully aware of CVS and the others mentioned. Would it be outside the scope to include say an RPM.spec (fedora/suse) file and the Debian directory into the CVS source tree ? or maybe create a second CVS source to contain such ?
I don't know anything about Debian directories, but just a general perspective note: If we get involved in making specific changes to try to track with the latest version of specific operating systems, we'll not do a good job of it and be forever out-of-date. Not to mention that if we try hard to keep everything current we'll spread already-thin resources even thinner. Our project has worked fairly well so far (since 1999) by staying as generic as possible, releasing source versions only. Specific users or developers sometimes tweak for specific operating systems and release binary versions from time to time, but those are done by individuals, not by the project as a whole. We encourage them to do so for those particular OS flavors that they're most familiar with. This is what I've done with the SuSE and LSB releases, what others have done for Debian, Ubuntu, Cygwin, OSX, etc. -- Curt, WE7U. <http://www.eskimo.com/~archer> APRS: Where it's at! <http://www.xastir.org> Lotto: A tax on people who are bad at math. - unknown Windows: Microsoft's tax on computer illiterates. - WE7U. The world DOES revolve around me: I picked the coordinate system!" _______________________________________________ Xastir mailing list Xastir@lists.xastir.org http://lists.xastir.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xastir