On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 11:12:34AM -0400, we recorded a bogon-computron collision of the <[email protected]> flavor, containing: > Thanks go out to you, Curt, and Tom for responding back. > > I think it is that the TNC can not read the data as fast as the computer is > sending it so I rolled back the Abaud rate to 300baud. May seem slow but > this isn't life or death here so a extra second won't kill anyone.
Interesting. What baud had you been using? I am pretty sure that back in the days when I used this TNC I was able to use at least 1200 or 4800 baud. 300 is even slower than the TNC is transmitting the data, and seems slower than necessary. > Working fine so far since the change. Interesting, too. Perhaps the KPC-2 accepts both "K" and "conv" after all. -- Tom Russo KM5VY SAR502 DM64ux http://www.swcp.com/~russo/ Tijeras, NM QRPL#1592 K2#398 SOC#236 http://kevan.org/brain.cgi?DDTNM "The truth will set you free, but first it will piss you off." _______________________________________________ Xastir mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xastir.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xastir
