On my Windows/APRSPoint setup, I was using 9600 baud. Jake
Sent from my iPhone On Apr 5, 2011, at 11:25 AM, Tom Russo <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 11:12:34AM -0400, we recorded a bogon-computron > collision of the <[email protected]> flavor, containing: >> Thanks go out to you, Curt, and Tom for responding back. >> >> I think it is that the TNC can not read the data as fast as the computer is >> sending it so I rolled back the Abaud rate to 300baud. May seem slow but >> this isn't life or death here so a extra second won't kill anyone. > > Interesting. What baud had you been using? I am pretty sure that back in > the days when I used this TNC I was able to use at least 1200 or 4800 baud. > > 300 is even slower than the TNC is transmitting the data, and seems slower > than necessary. > >> Working fine so far since the change. > > Interesting, too. Perhaps the KPC-2 accepts both "K" and "conv" after all. > > -- > Tom Russo KM5VY SAR502 DM64ux http://www.swcp.com/~russo/ > Tijeras, NM QRPL#1592 K2#398 SOC#236 http://kevan.org/brain.cgi?DDTNM > "The truth will set you free, but first it will piss you off." > > > _______________________________________________ > Xastir mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xastir.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xastir _______________________________________________ Xastir mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xastir.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xastir
