On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 06:46:36AM -0700, we recorded a bogon-computron collision of the <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> flavor, containing: > On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Jeremy Utley wrote: > > > As a non-developer I would agree with this as well. Major changes > > usually involve changes in the ABI/API that makes things incompatible > > with the previous release, or large changes in the code base that > > almost makes it an entirely new application. For just the minor > > changes that have been in CVS since the last stable release, it would > > seem a bump in the minor version would be the most we should do here. > > In other words go to 1.10 instead of 2.0, and make the next devel > version be 1.11?
No, I was thinking more like the next stable release would be 1.9.0 and the next devel snapshot would be 1.9.1, etc. > This might muck with the TOCALL a bit. Right now we're sending > APX185. We'd need to send APX110 which would appear to be going > backwards in our revisions. Can't we have seven character tocalls? APX1110? -- Tom Russo KM5VY SAR502 DM64ux http://www.swcp.com/~russo/ Tijeras, NM QRPL#1592 K2#398 SOC#236 AHTB#1 http://kevan.org/brain.cgi?DDTNM "And, isn't sanity really just a one-trick pony anyway? I mean all you get is one trick, rational thinking, but when you're good and crazy, oooh, oooh, oooh, the sky is the limit!" --- The Tick _______________________________________________ Xastir mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xastir.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xastir
