Evening,

What would the GPS be used for? APRS Tracking? Farming?

Farming actually.
The Phoenix GPS claims sub-meter accuracy. Barring marketing lies, this is not possible with only WAAS. WAAS would likely get you to 3 meter accuracy at best (Gerry N5JXS certainly knows more about this).

Ok thats what I was reckoning.
The eDif feature mentioned for th Phoenix appears to attempt to model ionosphere delays by analyzing multiple satellite signals over time. Normally ionospheric delay (signal bending) correction is done using a 2nd GPS frequency, on which the actual data is encrypted, but the clock information can be extracted. This 2nd frequency is what is normally referred to as "Military grade" GPS. The eDif claims to be able to get the same type of correction data out of a single frequency receiver. It also sounds like a costly add-on.

ok
The other differential positioning technologies mentioned are likely DGPS, where you have a separate GPS receiver at a precisely known position which radios out the offsets (within some "local" radius) between the GPS-derived position and its precisely known position. DGPS receivers recieve and incorporate these offsets into their calculations.

ok
The question back to you, I guess, would be: do your friend need sub-meter accuracy and 10Hz position updates? (Most NMEA-out GPSs output positions only at 1Hz or less, depending on the NMEA sentences enabled.)

Ok.

Short answer is I'm not really sure

I'll try and address Curt and Gerry's questions as well.

Firstly.. WAAS signals aren't a problem, the only mountains are North, and going south, next stop would be Spain. Most of the land is pretty flat.

The system is being marketed to do several things (apologies, I'm not at my desk, so the piece of paper I wrote the URL on is not available to me.. scratch that.. found it. http://www.farmworks.co.uk/gps.php click on GPS Swath Guidance ), one of which is to allow him to spread fertiliser with as little overlap as possible. This is because over the course of a season, the cost of the overlap is quite high apparently (in monetary terms). It must be appreciable as he is looking for a method to reduce that cost, but is sceptical of the solutions presented.

Purely as an exercise, I was going to try the GPS-18 that I have already, put GPSman running (or something) and drive one or two of his fields.. just to see what he thinks...all the locals looking at their APRS displays will think I've gone barmy...

Regards
John



--
John Ronan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, +353-51-302938
Telecommunications Software &  Systems Group,  http://www.tssg.org




_______________________________________________
Xastir mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xastir.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xastir

Reply via email to