On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 04:13:05PM -0400, we recorded a bogon-computron collision of the <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> flavor, containing: > I have noticed the same thing, the new code uses a smaller font on my > system. But I like it better though.
I like the *code* better (because I get to pick my own fonts to my heart's content), but the default made for an unpleasant surprise after an upgrade. But at least I didn't experience crashes like some folks are. > Quoting Tom Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 12:55:06PM -0700, we recorded a > > bogon-computron collision of the <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> flavor, > > containing: > >> > >> Yet another idea would be to use > >> "-*-fixed-medium-r-*-*-10-*-*-*-*-*-*-*" as the default font. Here > >> we specify only the parameters that are important and leave the rest > >> to the system. In fact near the top of main.c:main() you'll see > >> "*.fontList: -misc-fixed-*-r-*-*-10-*-*-*-*-*-*-*". This font gets > >> used if we don't set the font. But we do set the font. > > > > BTW, when I built and started using the new code, I found that this choice > > of > > default fixed font was significantly different from what "fixed" > > used to be on > > all of my systems. The menus started being ridiculously tiny. -- Tom Russo KM5VY SAR502 DM64ux http://www.swcp.com/~russo/ Tijeras, NM QRPL#1592 K2#398 SOC#236 AHTB#1 http://kevan.org/brain.cgi?DDTNM "Argue for your limitations and sure enough, they're yours." -- R. Bach _______________________________________________ Xastir mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xastir.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xastir
