I'd really prefer KDE to Gnome. However: Gnome is already bloated, and
KDE is heading that way.
I'd be happy with Apache, GPLv2 (I'm still not convinced about v3) or
LGPL. LGPL is about the easiest to go with...
gerry
Nick wrote:
I am definitely an extreme novice when it comes to code, but some of
this stuff is rubbing off Curt and on to me.
I decided to look up GPL and LGPL to see what all the banter was about
and I have an idea....How about using GNOME?
Cheers,
Nick
KC7RGL
Tom Russo wrote:
Now, there's one part of my suggestion that might be offensive to
Xastir folks. I think that a core aprslib should NOT be GPL! Open
source, yes, but released under LGPL, BSD, MIT or similar license.
To make the most of the concept, EVERYONE (even commercial
developers) should use this library as the core of their products.
I'd go as far as thinking the library should be LGPL. BSD and MIT are
good
licenses for some purposes, but the idea of allowing a closed-source
fork is not one I think most Xastir developers will be happy with.
I'd agree with them.
_______________________________________________
Xastir mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xastir.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xastir
--
Gerry Creager -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Texas Mesonet -- AATLT, Texas A&M University
Cell: 979.229.5301 Office: 979.458.4020 FAX: 979.862.3983
Office: 1700 Research Parkway Ste 160, TAMU, College Station, TX 77843
_______________________________________________
Xastir mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xastir.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xastir
