Jason, I think there are some problems with releasing Genesis, as it depends on snapshot versions of maven stuff. Would it be possible to release a 0.1 version reverting to the non-snapshot maven jars, and switch back just after that ?
Or maybe we should revert back to our old standalone pom, and use genesis once these issues are solved. What does genesis offer to xbean ? I guess you did that for the maven site css, right ? On 8/24/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No, there was not. Jason, what' s the added value of genesis for xbean right now ? If it prevent us to release, can we wait a bit or revert ? I think Jason did that to use the geronimo css for xbean maven site. On 8/24/06, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Good question. What is genesis? Did I miss an RTC vote? > > > Regards, > Alan > > Dain Sundstrom wrote: > > Does xbean need genesis? > > > > -dain > > > > On Aug 23, 2006, at 6:18 PM, David Blevins wrote: > > > >> Do we really want xbean dependent on genesis? Seems like it's not > >> working out too well. > >> > >> -David > >> > >> Begin forwarded message: > >> > >>> From: "Guillaume Nodet" < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>> Date: August 23, 2006 1:44:02 PM PDT > >>> To: dev@geronimo.apache.org > >>> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Car maven plugin dedicated to G 1.1 > >>> Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org > >>> > >>> I would totally agree with you if maven allows you to release > >>> something which > >>> is dependant on a snapshot (even a plugin). Which unfortunately is > >>> not the case ... > >>> > >>> Btw, a non snapshot release of genesis would be nice, because i'd > >>> like to > >>> ask for a release of xbean (which is now dependant on genesis) > >>> The xbean release is needed to release the jencks project which has > >>> been > >>> updated to G 1.1, and which is a dependency of ServiceMix. > >>> ServiceMix also > >>> depends on the snapshot car-plugin for G. > >>> ... and I was hoping i would be able to ask for a ServiceMix release > >>> in a few > >>> weeks ... > >>> > >>> Seriously, i can put it anywhere you want, but i really need a > released > >>> version asap, and not have to wait 3 or 4 months until 1.1.2 is > >>> shipped. > >>> > >>> Well, i always have the possibility to build it and deploy it in > >>> ServiceMix > >>> private repo under a timestamped version (but not a snapshots). > >>> But I'm sure i'm not the only one in this case and I'd rather do it > >>> the right way. > >>> > >>> > >>> On 8/23/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I think we just > >>> add it to 1.1, leave it as a snapshot plugin for the > >>> moment, and then release it when 1.1.2 rolls out. > >>> > >>> --jason > >>> > >>> > >>> On Aug 23, 2006, at 7:56 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: > >>> > >>> > -1 on adding it to 1.1.1. Put it in 1.1.2. 1.1.1 has been > >>> > delayed for a few weeks for minor changes. > >>> > > >>> > Jason Dillon wrote: > >>> >> On Aug 22, 2006, at 4:12 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > >>> >>> On 8/23/06, Jason Dillon < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> >>> Its probably not going to go into 1.1.1 unless you have it done > >>> >>> right now and all is good... but defs for 1.1.2. > >>> >>> > >>> >>> It's done and it works for my plugins. That does not mean there > > >>> >>> is no bugs. > >>> >> Mkay... so lets add it to branches/1.1, merge to 1.1.1 and > include > >>> >> it in the release. > >>> >>> But we could always make a 1.1.1.1 with just that addition of > the > >>> >>> plugin. > >>> >>> > >>> >>> Do you volunteer do release the full geronimo server, just to > >>> >>> include a plugin, > >>> >>> which would btw not be included in the distribution itself ? > >>> >> I'm not gonna volunteer to do any m1 related stuff :-P m2 stuff > >>> >> is killing me asis... :-\ > >>> >> --jason > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> --Cheers, > >>> Guillaume Nodet > > > > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet
-- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet
