No, there was not.
Jason, what' s the added value of genesis for xbean right now ?
If it prevent us to release, can we wait a bit or revert ?
I think Jason did that to use the geronimo css for xbean maven site.
On 8/24/06, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Good question. What is genesis? Did I miss an RTC vote?
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
> Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> > Does xbean need genesis?
> >
> > -dain
> >
> > On Aug 23, 2006, at 6:18 PM, David Blevins wrote:
> >
> >> Do we really want xbean dependent on genesis? Seems like
it's not
> >> working out too well.
> >>
> >> -David
> >>
> >> Begin forwarded message:
> >>
> >>> From: "Guillaume Nodet" < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>> Date: August 23, 2006 1:44:02 PM PDT
> >>> To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
> >>> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Car maven plugin dedicated to G 1.1
> >>> Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
> >>>
> >>> I would totally agree with you if maven allows you to release
> >>> something which
> >>> is dependant on a snapshot (even a plugin). Which
unfortunately is
> >>> not the case ...
> >>>
> >>> Btw, a non snapshot release of genesis would be nice,
because i'd
> >>> like to
> >>> ask for a release of xbean (which is now dependant on genesis)
> >>> The xbean release is needed to release the jencks project
which has
> >>> been
> >>> updated to G 1.1, and which is a dependency of ServiceMix.
> >>> ServiceMix also
> >>> depends on the snapshot car-plugin for G.
> >>> ... and I was hoping i would be able to ask for a ServiceMix
release
> >>> in a few
> >>> weeks ...
> >>>
> >>> Seriously, i can put it anywhere you want, but i really need a
> released
> >>> version asap, and not have to wait 3 or 4 months until 1.1.2 is
> >>> shipped.
> >>>
> >>> Well, i always have the possibility to build it and deploy
it in
> >>> ServiceMix
> >>> private repo under a timestamped version (but not a snapshots).
> >>> But I'm sure i'm not the only one in this case and I'd
rather do it
> >>> the right way.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 8/23/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I think
we just
> >>> add it to 1.1, leave it as a snapshot plugin for the
> >>> moment, and then release it when 1.1.2 rolls out.
> >>>
> >>> --jason
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Aug 23, 2006, at 7:56 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > -1 on adding it to 1.1.1. Put it in 1.1.2. 1.1.1 has been
> >>> > delayed for a few weeks for minor changes.
> >>> >
> >>> > Jason Dillon wrote:
> >>> >> On Aug 22, 2006, at 4:12 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> >>> >>> On 8/23/06, Jason Dillon < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> >>> Its probably not going to go into 1.1.1 unless you have
it done
> >>> >>> right now and all is good... but defs for 1.1.2.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> It's done and it works for my plugins. That does not
mean there
>
> >>> >>> is no bugs.
> >>> >> Mkay... so lets add it to branches/1.1, merge to 1.1.1 and
> include
> >>> >> it in the release.
> >>> >>> But we could always make a 1.1.1.1 with just that
addition of
> the
> >>> >>> plugin.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Do you volunteer do release the full geronimo server,
just to
> >>> >>> include a plugin,
> >>> >>> which would btw not be included in the distribution
itself ?
> >>> >> I'm not gonna volunteer to do any m1 related stuff :-P
m2 stuff
> >>> >> is killing me asis... :-\
> >>> >> --jason
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --Cheers,
> >>> Guillaume Nodet
> >
>
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet