On Jan 23, 2009, at 7:04 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
Thanks for the response Jacek.
If nobody objects, I'll go ahead and create a release candidate now.
However, I am sensitive to the fact that I have not been contributing
directly to this subproject ... so if somebody would rather do the
release
instead of me then please, don't be shy and speak up.
In the event that nobody objects; I have some questions:
It appears the the maven release process has been used in the past to
release directly from trunk without creating a branch. Is that
correct?
I also notice that there is no dependency on genesis and comments to
the
effect that this is desired. So, I will keep things as-is.
Also, as the current snapshot is 3.5-SNAPSHOT the new release will
be 3.5.
I assume this is desired. I ask because I noticed that the previous
three
releases were 3.4.x and I don't personally know if the changes that
have
been integrated are considered sufficient to bump the release to 3.5.
Anything else that I should be aware of?
I don't recall if I fixed this and it isn't really essential for a
release but we should make sure unique snapshots are turned off to not
clutter up apache snapshots repo.
I'd go for 3.5.
thanks
david jencks
Thanks,
Joe
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Joe Bohn <[email protected]>
wrote:
What is the status of the asm shading issue? Can we pursue a
release
yet?
Go with it. If I don't finish it before the release goes out it's to
be included in the next one.
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
Notatnik Projektanta Java EE - http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/xbean-3.5-release--tp20795885p21625992.html
Sent from the xbean-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
