On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Rintze Zelle <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 2:31 AM, Dan Stillman <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Previews are now up. > > One nitpick: the preview box always goes down, which means that I cannot see > the preview for styles near the bottom of my browser window (and scrolling > isn't a solution for the last few styles on the page). > >> >> For now I just went with the sample data we were using on the old repo. >> Better data would definitely be good. > > Better how? Is the range of item types too limited? If so, would it be > feasible to use different sets of data for styles in the different fields? > E.g. for the sciences, the main item types are probably journal articles, > books, book chapters, patents, thesises and reports, while fields like law > and humanities are likely to be more diverse.
https://github.com/citation-style-language/styles/issues/4 The current preview stuff isn't too bad, but could probably be enhanced along lines I suggest in that ticket. BTW, the doi URL and access dates for many of these (e.g. the journal article) sample data should be removed. Bruce ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ What Every C/C++ and Fortran developer Should Know! Read this article and learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools to help Windows* and Linux* C/C++ and Fortran developers boost performance applications - including clusters. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay _______________________________________________ xbiblio-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel
