BTW, where the hell is the sample data? If it was available, say, in a github repo, I would have already fixed some of the problems I note (including wrong dates) and issued a pull request.
Where, ideally, do we want this sample data? On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Bruce D'Arcus <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Rintze Zelle <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 2:31 AM, Dan Stillman <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Previews are now up. >> >> One nitpick: the preview box always goes down, which means that I cannot see >> the preview for styles near the bottom of my browser window (and scrolling >> isn't a solution for the last few styles on the page). >> >>> >>> For now I just went with the sample data we were using on the old repo. >>> Better data would definitely be good. >> >> Better how? Is the range of item types too limited? If so, would it be >> feasible to use different sets of data for styles in the different fields? >> E.g. for the sciences, the main item types are probably journal articles, >> books, book chapters, patents, thesises and reports, while fields like law >> and humanities are likely to be more diverse. > > https://github.com/citation-style-language/styles/issues/4 > > The current preview stuff isn't too bad, but could probably be > enhanced along lines I suggest in that ticket. > > BTW, the doi URL and access dates for many of these (e.g. the journal > article) sample data should be removed. > > Bruce > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ What Every C/C++ and Fortran developer Should Know! Read this article and learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools to help Windows* and Linux* C/C++ and Fortran developers boost performance applications - including clusters. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay _______________________________________________ xbiblio-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel
