The style is complicated because it citing all reference types according to Chicago as correctly as possible.
What are the problems with the style? Elena On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Bruce D'Arcus <[email protected]> wrote: > Pandoc is using chicago-author-date as their default citation style, > and as a consequence of turned up some funky style bugs. This style is > trying to be far too clever, and as a consequence, doesn't work very > well. Consider this macro: > > https://github.com/citation-style-language/styles/blob/master/chicago-author-date.csl#L267 > > Before I hack this, does anyone know why this macro is so complicated > ,with all the long-lists of type-based tests? > > For pandoc, I suggest you use APA as default. > > Bruce > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure > contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, > security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this > data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d > _______________________________________________ > xbiblio-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d _______________________________________________ xbiblio-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel
