"Bruce D'Arcus" <[email protected]> writes: > On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Elena Razlogova > <[email protected]> wrote: >> The style is complicated because it citing all reference types >> according to Chicago as correctly as possible. >> >> What are the problems with the style? > > It's mostly around "Anon" substitution (already fixed), and point > locator labels. See, for example: > > <http://groups.google.com/group/pandoc-discuss/msg/7165944a1822af0f> > > I am assuming this problem is related to the "point-locators" macro, > but am not sure.
Yes, it seems like "point-locators" is buggy since it renders the locator's label (p., chap., etc.) only for a limited set of entry types (for instance, books but not a book's chapter or an article) while it renders the locator (the page or chapter number) for every type. But this is just my guess, based John's reactions. It may be possible that this is a Chicago style requirement -- I wouldn't know. Andrea ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d _______________________________________________ xbiblio-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel
