We could prevent anybody from committing to the 'tested' branch with a 
commit-hook 
(http://www.galengrover.com/git/prevent-committing-to-master-with-git-hooks/). 
The branch can then only be used as a pointer.

I honestly don't know which way is easier, so in the end, whatever works is 
good for me. You may be right: a separate repo could be easier to enforce.

charles


On Jul 16, 2012, at 1:28 PM, Rintze Zelle wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Charles Parnot <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> Regarding adding more control on what gets into the clients, I also think it 
> would be good to have at least one level of control, and prevent commits with 
> failures to make it to the clients. There is much simpler alternative to 
> having a separate repository, and that's to have instead a separate branch.
> 
> The benefit I see in having a separate repository is that it would be safer: 
> fewer people could have write access to the "verified repository", and people 
> wouldn't be able to accidentally commit to the wrong branch.
> 
> Rintze
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Live Security Virtual Conference
> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
> threats. 
> http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/_______________________________________________
> xbiblio-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel

--
Charles Parnot
[email protected]
twitter: @cparnot
http://mekentosj.com



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
xbiblio-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel

Reply via email to