On Jul 17, 2012, at 4:07 PM, Rintze Zelle wrote: > Yes, keeping the master branch of > https://github.com/citation-style-language/styles as the canonical one makes > sense. > > So the consensus seems to be that a new branch for untested test should > suffice? I'd be very happy if one of you could pick up the gauntlet and set > this up (I prefer to hide behind the excuse that I'm not a professional > programmer). I can give read/write access to the repo to anybody interested.
I'll gladly create the new branch and set up the test-environment there. Any preferences for the branch name? (I would have suggested 'development' or 'dev' myself) Sylvester
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________ xbiblio-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel
