On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Rintze Zelle <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree. Some ideas for further improvements: > - we have metadata for several publishers, but as journals get added, > renamed, or discontinued, we need to update it. We could do this > ourselves periodically, e.g. once a year (several publishers publish > their journal metadata online). It is probably also worthwhile to > clarify our documentation on contributing styles to let users (and > publishers) know that we have publisher-specific metadata, and that if > they want to add/rename/delete a style from one of these publishers, > they don't need to bother with touching CSL XML.
In addition to this, we should explain to users how they can quickly check whether their journal is covered by one of our independent styles. E.g. we could write documentation with questions such as: - Is the journal publisher by Elsevier? - If so, does the citation format in the Instructions to Authors match that of Biological Conservation? - If so, use elsevier-harvard.csl. Et cetera. It's basically what Sebastian already does himself. Rintze ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Own the Future-Intel(R) Level Up Game Demo Contest 2013 Rise to greatness in Intel's independent game demo contest. Compete for recognition, cash, and the chance to get your game on Steam. $5K grand prize plus 10 genre and skill prizes. Submit your demo by 6/6/13. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/12124-176961-30367-2 _______________________________________________ xbiblio-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel
