Hi, On 2 May 2014 21:50, Maloney, Christopher (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] <malon...@ncbi.nlm.nih.gov> wrote: > I see that CSL defines page range format > (http://citationstyles.org/downloads/specification.html#appendix-v-page-range-formats) > for determining how page ranges are supposed to display. I just want to > verify that in the citeproc-json format, it is good and proper to always give > the full numbers in the page range? I.e., it should be ` "page": "479-482"`, > and not ` "page": "479-82"`? > > I notice that the json produced by Mendeley has the latter, and I suspect > that it is wrong, but I want to make sure.
Yes, this is wrong. My guess is that the original "page" field in the Document details is 479-82. AFAIR we just pass the page there - we don't manipulate it at all. -- Carles Pina | Software Engineer http://www.mendeley.com/profiles/Carles-Pina/ Mendeley Limited | London, UK | www.mendeley.com Registered in England and Wales | Company Number 6419015 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Is your legacy SCM system holding you back? Join Perforce May 7 to find out: • 3 signs your SCM is hindering your productivity • Requirements for releasing software faster • Expert tips and advice for migrating your SCM now http://p.sf.net/sfu/perforce _______________________________________________ xbiblio-devel mailing list xbiblio-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel
