> From: Carles Pina [mailto:carles.p...@mendeley.com]
> Hi,
> 
> On 2 May 2014 21:50, Maloney, Christopher (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C]
> <malon...@ncbi.nlm.nih.gov> wrote:
> > I see that CSL defines page range format
> (http://citationstyles.org/downloads/specification.html#appendix-v-page-
> range-formats) for determining how page ranges are supposed to display.  I
> just want to verify that in the citeproc-json format, it is good and proper to
> always give the full numbers in the page range?  I.e., it should be ` "page":
> "479-482"`, and not  ` "page": "479-82"`?
> >
> > I notice that the json produced by Mendeley has the latter, and I suspect
> that it is wrong, but I want to make  sure.
> 
> Yes, this is wrong. My guess is that the original "page" field in the Document
> details is 479-82. AFAIR we just pass the page there - we don't manipulate it
> at all.
> 

Sebastian Karcher wrote:

> As Frank says, the full date range is clearly and always preferred, but CSL 
> processors should (and citeproc-js can) convert 479-82 to
> 479-482 when page-range-format="expanded" is set (which isn't the case for 
> most styles at this time, but could be done relatively easily if it's 
> important).

Frank Bennett wrote:

> Yes, absolutely. Full information should be in the data.


Yeah, a lot of people would say it's not important: "it's cosmetic".  But, of 
course, just about everything related to citation styles is cosmetic.  I'd 
rather see the "hub format", i.e. the citeproc-json, be somewhat strict in 
this, and unambiguously require the "full information", "479-482".  That would 
lower the burden on the processors, and would help to guarantee consistent 
behavior across processors, and when the CSLs don't specify a page-range-format.

Chris Maloney
NIH/NLM/NCBI (Contractor)
Building 45, 5AN.24D-22
301-594-2842

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is your legacy SCM system holding you back? Join Perforce May 7 to find out:
&#149; 3 signs your SCM is hindering your productivity
&#149; Requirements for releasing software faster
&#149; Expert tips and advice for migrating your SCM now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/perforce
_______________________________________________
xbiblio-devel mailing list
xbiblio-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel

Reply via email to