On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Sebastian Karcher <karc...@u.northwestern.edu> wrote: >> but instead can just copy and paste some references that already exist in >> the desired format, and have the tool show CSL styles that give similar >> output. > > I talked to Steve about this back when he wrote the tool - I suggested > at a more basic level to allow using items supplied via citation data > supplied as CSL-JSON or RIS, but the main bottleneck isn't actually > getting the data in (the task that Sylvester's tool would make very > simple). The problem is that it takes a significant time (5-10mins?) > to generate citations in all styles for new data and those new > citations are needed to generate the set of closest matches. > It may still be possible to use a similar approach to do this, > especially if Sylvester's tool could be extended to more quickly > identify similar styles, but that's going to be a lot more advanced > than simply plugging it into the existing CSL editor, unfortunately.
I'm wondering how citeproc-ruby, citeproc-js, and citeproc-hs compare, performance wise. And even if a user needs to wait a few minutes, that might still be a better experience than the current setup. Rintze ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free." http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs _______________________________________________ xbiblio-devel mailing list xbiblio-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel
