It's off-topic, but getting Wiley on board would help quite a bit with trimming down the number of independent styles. I never got any further in their bureaucracy than a single dysfunctional reply:
"Unfortunately, I regret to inform you that we already have our own way of standardizing and handling journal citation/reference styles. Nonetheless, we would like to thank you for your offer." when I asked them whether they use a limited set of citation formats for their journals. If any of you have good contacts at Wiley, let me know. Rintze On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Robert Knight <robert.kni...@mendeley.com> wrote: >> We can and should definitely lobby for >> fewer styles - but realistically I wouldn't expect much to >> change on this front in the medium term. > > I don't think it is so much a matter of "lobbying" as maximizing the > convenience to librarians, > departments or whoever else makes the decisions of picking an existing style. > > But yes, I take your point. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free." http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs _______________________________________________ xbiblio-devel mailing list xbiblio-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel
