"Sebastian Karcher" wrote:
Could you explain: > Actually, for our examples, even for ahead-of-print, we have both the > e-publication and the `issued` date. As I mentioned, I'm using absence of > `volume` to determine the ahead-of-print status. Why? Or rather, what's the issued date for those? Is it in the future? Yes, it’s in the future. So, question for others is -- are there any objections to an additional e-pub date in CSL? Just to summarize, the main reasons we'd want it is that a) It's needed for some citation styles, most importantly NLM b) It's available in several metadata formats, including google's embedded metadata and Pubmed data.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ xbiblio-devel mailing list xbiblio-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel
