If I understand correctly, we're talking about the CSL JSON format here, correct? If so, I don't think it makes a lot of sense semantically to supply dates as a complex string within the JSON format. JSON gives you all the flexibility you need to supply date ranges, approximate dates, date-times, time zones, whatever else you want to support. It's just a matter of adding some more clearly defined and directly accessible properties. Am I missing something here?
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 11:27 PM, Bruce D'Arcus <bdar...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think what you see in citeproc-js is shaped by practical decisions > Zotero made. As in, was better to be loose with the expectations here. > > But I've always favored defining CSL dates as EDTF. Not sure what the > implementers would think about that though, as a requirement. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > xbiblio-devel mailing list > xbiblio-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel > >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ xbiblio-devel mailing list xbiblio-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel
