I agree that would be confusing and while technically my version is
definitely not a quick fork, I build it from the ground up using Confluence
as a base, it still looks like Aeon. Well the dark themed Aeon anyway. Off
course I think it's sufficiently different from other Aeon skins, but I'm
not the judge of that. I acknowledge that by submitting the skin to the
official repo I'm committing myself to maintain the skin, I waited with
submission for official repo till it was out of beta.
Only thing I missed is a theme I have in the media folder as a xbt file.
This will be disregarded by the texturepacker I believe.
Anyway, thx for your consideration.
2011/4/10 Cory Fields <[email protected]>
> On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Big Noid <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 1) Okay, I thought that it was released to the public when original
> Aeon
> > was abandoned.
> >>
> >> 2) This I don't see happening.
> >> 3) I just followed the body on the wiki page.
> >>
> >> Too bad, it would be nice for non-forum users to have access to an Aeon
> >> skin.
> >>
> >> 2011/4/9 Jezz_X <[email protected]>
> >>>
> >>> I'll jump in on a couple of things TheUni will probably say
> >>> 1) You need to get written permission from djh (original AEON author)
> >>> 2) It seems they only want 1 version of each skin in the official repo
> >>> and AEON is a skin that has 20 versions so the last conversation about
> it
> >>> was we need to make one version of AEON that all devs work on. I know
> this
> >>> isn't ever going to happen but it was what TheUni wanted last time he
> >>> rejected an AEON skin entrance to the repo
> >>> 3) Pretty sure we don't have a eden-pre repo yet
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 7:59 PM, Big Noid <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> *addon - skin.aeon.nox
> >>>> *version - 1.0
> >>>> *url - http://aeon--nox.googlecode.com/svn/trunk
> >>>> *revision - 639
> >>>> *branch - trunk
> >>>> *xbmc version - dharma, eden-pre
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> Xperia(TM) PLAY
> >>>> It's a major breakthrough. An authentic gaming
> >>>> smartphone on the nation's most reliable network.
> >>>> And it wants your games.
> >>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-sfdev
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Xbmc-addons mailing list
> >>>> [email protected]
> >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbmc-addons
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Xperia(TM) PLAY
> > It's a major breakthrough. An authentic gaming
> > smartphone on the nation's most reliable network.
> > And it wants your games.
> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-sfdev
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xbmc-addons mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbmc-addons
> >
> >
>
> Thanks for the submission!
>
> 1. I believe djh Assigned a licence at one point. So iirc, this has
> been handled. I'll try to track that down.
> 2. It's not that I expected all devs to come together for one skin,
> it's that I *don't* want 10 mods of the same skin in the repo. If this
> is sufficiently different and not a quick mod of one of the forks (I
> am away this weekend, can't run it atm), and you plan to maintain
> it... assuming it fits the other repo guidelines, I'm ok with it. The
> same goes for the other Aeon forks, but I hope you will agree that it
> would only be confusing to average users to have several skins that
> *appear* identical.
> 3. Eden-pre will be branched this week.
>
> Cory
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Xperia(TM) PLAY
It's a major breakthrough. An authentic gaming
smartphone on the nation's most reliable network.
And it wants your games.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-sfdev
_______________________________________________
Xbmc-addons mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbmc-addons
