Although it is not certain yet that this skin will be in the offical repo, I
would like to ask if I can change the pull request in case it will be
submitted. I had some fixes and a user request implemented and I branched
off a pre-eden version.
*addon - skin.aeon.nox
*version - 1.0
*url - http://aeon--nox.googlecode.com/svn/trunk
*revision - 649
*branch - trunk
*xbmc version - dharma
cheers
2011/4/10 Big Noid <[email protected]>
> I agree that would be confusing and while technically my version is
> definitely not a quick fork, I build it from the ground up using Confluence
> as a base, it still looks like Aeon. Well the dark themed Aeon anyway. Off
> course I think it's sufficiently different from other Aeon skins, but I'm
> not the judge of that. I acknowledge that by submitting the skin to the
> official repo I'm committing myself to maintain the skin, I waited with
> submission for official repo till it was out of beta.
> Only thing I missed is a theme I have in the media folder as a xbt file.
> This will be disregarded by the texturepacker I believe.
> Anyway, thx for your consideration.
>
>
> 2011/4/10 Cory Fields <[email protected]>
>
>> On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Big Noid <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > 1) Okay, I thought that it was released to the public when original
>> Aeon
>> > was abandoned.
>> >>
>> >> 2) This I don't see happening.
>> >> 3) I just followed the body on the wiki page.
>> >>
>> >> Too bad, it would be nice for non-forum users to have access to an Aeon
>> >> skin.
>> >>
>> >> 2011/4/9 Jezz_X <[email protected]>
>> >>>
>> >>> I'll jump in on a couple of things TheUni will probably say
>> >>> 1) You need to get written permission from djh (original AEON author)
>> >>> 2) It seems they only want 1 version of each skin in the official repo
>> >>> and AEON is a skin that has 20 versions so the last conversation about
>> it
>> >>> was we need to make one version of AEON that all devs work on. I
>> know this
>> >>> isn't ever going to happen but it was what TheUni wanted last time he
>> >>> rejected an AEON skin entrance to the repo
>> >>> 3) Pretty sure we don't have a eden-pre repo yet
>> >>>
>> >>> On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 7:59 PM, Big Noid <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> *addon - skin.aeon.nox
>> >>>> *version - 1.0
>> >>>> *url - http://aeon--nox.googlecode.com/svn/trunk
>> >>>> *revision - 639
>> >>>> *branch - trunk
>> >>>> *xbmc version - dharma, eden-pre
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>> Xperia(TM) PLAY
>> >>>> It's a major breakthrough. An authentic gaming
>> >>>> smartphone on the nation's most reliable network.
>> >>>> And it wants your games.
>> >>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-sfdev
>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>> Xbmc-addons mailing list
>> >>>> [email protected]
>> >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbmc-addons
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > Xperia(TM) PLAY
>> > It's a major breakthrough. An authentic gaming
>> > smartphone on the nation's most reliable network.
>> > And it wants your games.
>> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-sfdev
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Xbmc-addons mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbmc-addons
>> >
>> >
>>
>> Thanks for the submission!
>>
>> 1. I believe djh Assigned a licence at one point. So iirc, this has
>> been handled. I'll try to track that down.
>> 2. It's not that I expected all devs to come together for one skin,
>> it's that I *don't* want 10 mods of the same skin in the repo. If this
>> is sufficiently different and not a quick mod of one of the forks (I
>> am away this weekend, can't run it atm), and you plan to maintain
>> it... assuming it fits the other repo guidelines, I'm ok with it. The
>> same goes for the other Aeon forks, but I hope you will agree that it
>> would only be confusing to average users to have several skins that
>> *appear* identical.
>> 3. Eden-pre will be branched this week.
>>
>> Cory
>>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload
Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top
priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simplify management, and improve
application availability and disaster protection. Learn more about boosting
the value of server virtualization. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Xbmc-addons mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbmc-addons
