> anything in there worth porting to the v4.6.x branch? In that case we > could include it in 4.6.2
No, I don't think so. The only things that were real errors were in new code, and most of the implicit declarations were caused by splitting up files so that the callers got separated from the functions they called. I did find a new buglet w.r.t. casting rights when editing positions in variants with holdings, though. (Q-side rights were never granted, not even if there was a Rook on a1/a8.) I already pushed the fix to Savannah v4.6.x (plus another cosmetic one).
