The only thing I might add:

When I first went to copy it to /Applications, the Finder said (after MUCH 
churning) that I was about to replace a newer item with an older one. I 
couldn't make sense of the created/modified dates I saw on the two packages 
(the beta 2 in /Applications and the beta 3 in the .dmg), so I decided to copy 
it to the Desktop instead, and then compare the two build numbers in the About 
box. Perhaps it has something to do with launching from the Desktop? I hope not!

Note that THIS is because the Get Info window doesn't show a useful version 
number. It really needs to show something like 7.0b3, otherwise it's impossible 
to tell versions apart without launching them, especially when their 
modification dates seem incorrect.

> On Jul 16, 2015, at 07:36 , Joar Wingfors <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I’ve heard of a single / very few other reports of this problem. I’m not 
> aware of why you would encounter it. The safest thing to do might be to 
> download a new copy. Please let us know if you cannot resolve this issue. 
> 
> Joar
> 
> 
>> On 15 Jul 2015, at 17:53, Rick Mann <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Is anyone else getting this warning? I just downloaded this a few minutes 
>> ago from developer.apple.com.
>> 
>> <Screen Shot 2015-07-15 at 17.52.18 .png>
>> 
>> -- 
>> Rick Mann
>> [email protected]
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>> Xcode-users mailing list      ([email protected])
>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/xcode-users/joar%40joar.com
>> 
>> This email sent to [email protected]
> 


-- 
Rick Mann
[email protected]



 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list      ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/xcode-users/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to [email protected]

Reply via email to