> On Apr 6, 2016, at 8:04 PM, Luther Baker <lutherba...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I have no idea what I'm talking about but I sort of wish the IDE tooling were 
> more separated from the SDK. It seems odd that one has to keep upgrading the 
> operating system and IDE to use the newer iOS SDKs.

I agree, and I suspect the Xcode team agrees too, but there are probably hidden 
complications that would make it hard to split them up (as they used to be, 
when there was a separate /Developer folder.) I can imagine there would be all 
sorts of conflicts where version A of the SDK wouldn’t work with version B of 
Xcode because of some new compiler feature or language syntax change or 
something…

> Swift is in such flux right now. Surprised to see operator++ was deprecated. 
> Paradigm shifts and obvious changes aside - for me, that change alone 
> signifies a real changing of the guard.

Yeah, it’s a bit of a bumpy ride using Swift, but I’m impressed at how 
committed they are to doing the hard work of making the language cleaner. (And 
the process is all very open; if you follow the Swift mailing lists you can see 
the individual proposals and debate them and even propose your own. IIRC the 
“++” deprecation was suggested by people outside the Swift core team.)

It helps that they have a secret weapon in Xcode’s “fix-it” feature. It’s a lot 
more feasible to change the language syntax when the IDE can upgrade everyone's 
source code semi-automatically.

—Jens
 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list      (Xcode-users@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/xcode-users/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to