> On 20 May 2016, at 18:02, Carl Hoefs <newsli...@autonomy.caltech.edu> wrote: > > >> On May 20, 2016, at 9:52 AM, Jens Alfke <j...@mooseyard.com> wrote: >> >> Development on Macs (primarily for iOS) is such a big business these days >> that if it were a slam-dunk to build something better than Xcode, ... > > I think Dave is talking about Xcode 4+. Xcode 3.2.6 pretty much got it > right. No one knows why such a successful design was abandoned without notice.
I have to agree - I really don’t get the “assistant editor” concept. Pre-v4, I could split my windows up any way I wanted and load in whatever file was useful to me. Now I can only split the RH window (and then only with horz dividers) and if I want to swap the (files in the) left & right panes around, I have to faff around. And who thought it was a good idea to have the build output dumped in the window you were working in by default? (Yes, I’ve found a way around it now, but I shouldn’t have had to.) Of course, everyone has their preferences, but that was the beauty of v3:I could adapt it to suit the way I worked; with v4, I had to change the way I work to suit it.
_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Xcode-users mailing list (Xcode-users@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/xcode-users/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
