On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 7:04 PM, Daniel Gruner <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> Hi Abhishek,
>
> Well, I compiled it and installed it (the Makefile needs work...), and
> it stays up as a daemon, but doesn't show any available nodes:
>
> [r...@dgk3 bjs]# bjsstat
> Pool: default   Nodes (total/up/free): 0/0/0
> ID      User     Command                        Requirements
>
> Did you change anything in the format for the bjs.conf file?


Yes I added an extra option (statfs) which can be specified as:

statfs      localhost!20003

bjs would fetch the node information from statfs.
Although, the 'nodes' parameter in bjs.conf remains -- an intersection set
of the two dictates the total nodes for bjs.


>
>
> Daniel
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 10:10 AM, Abhishek Kulkarni <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 9:37 PM, Daniel Gruner <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Abhishek,
> >>
> >> What is the status of your port of bjs?  Is it part of the sxcpu tree
> >> (or pulled when one checks out from the sxcpu svn repository)?  I'd
> >> really like to test it...
> >
> > Daniel,
> >
> > You probably missed the quick announcement, here it is again:
> >
> http://groups.google.com/group/xcpu/browse_thread/thread/42ed613c72fe55ba#
> >
> > After syncing changes between the sxcpu and the xcpu2 tree, it could be
> used
> > for either.
> > Let me know how it works for you.
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Daniel
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Abhishek Kulkarni <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > This patch makes bjs comply with the changed semantics of
> >> > xp_nodeset_list_by_state to obtain the down nodes from statfs.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kulkarni <[email protected]>
> >> >
> >> > Index: bjs.c
> >> > ===================================================================
> >> > --- bjs.c       (revision 746)
> >> > +++ bjs.c       (working copy)
> >> > @@ -2481,19 +2481,7 @@
> >> >
> >> >        if (r > 0) {
> >> >            /* Check for machine status changes */
> >> > -           /* TODO: Instead of jumping over these hoops, improve the
> >> > -              way down nodes can be obtained from statfs */
> >> > -
> >> > -           down_nodeset = xp_nodeset_list_by_state(conf.statfsaddr,
> >> > "down(initializing)");
> >> > -           xp_nodeset_append(down_nodeset,
> >> > -
> xp_nodeset_list_by_state(conf.statfsaddr,
> >> > "down(disconnected)"));
> >> > -           xp_nodeset_append(down_nodeset,
> >> > -
> xp_nodeset_list_by_state(conf.statfsaddr,
> >> > "down(connect_failed)"));
> >> > -           xp_nodeset_append(down_nodeset,
> >> > -
> xp_nodeset_list_by_state(conf.statfsaddr,
> >> > "down(read_failed)"));
> >> > -           xp_nodeset_append(down_nodeset,
> >> > -
> xp_nodeset_list_by_state(conf.statfsaddr,
> >> > "down(no_contact)"));
> >> > -
> >> > +           down_nodeset = xp_nodeset_list_by_state(conf.statfsaddr,
> 0);
> >> >            if (down_nodeset->len != down_nodes) {
> >> >                if (verbose) syslog(LOG_INFO, "XCPU cluster status
> >> > change.");
> >> >                chng = update_cluster_status(conf.statfsaddr);
> >> > @@ -2505,9 +2493,10 @@
> >> >                            p->policy->state_change(p);
> >> >                    }
> >> >                }
> >> > +               down_nodes = down_nodeset->len;
> >> >            }
> >> > -           down_nodes = down_nodeset->len;
> >> >
> >> > +
> >> >            /* Check for new clients */
> >> >            if (FD_ISSET(conf.client_sockfd, &rset))
> >> >                client_accept();
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to