Might be an option. The problem is that we need to scan for that format in every airspace name and that obviously takes time and it doesn't matter if the frequency is in there or not, it will be slightly slower. If it was an accepted standard that wouldn't be such a big disadvantage but implementing a scan for every possible format takes a lot of time at loading and I am not quite sure if this is a good idea. It might be worth it to see how the other countries are doing it... if there is a certain number of different files with a similar format I think we could consider implementing that.
Turbo Am 21.12.2010 19:24, schrieb Martin Gregorie: > On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 09:05 -0800, karaka29211 wrote: >> Adding a frequency field to the open air format isn't as easy as it sounds. >> The problem is that the people providing the open air file need to be aware >> of such a feature and use it. Also the addition of stuff to that file format >> standard is not within our hands... The only thing we could do is support a >> non-standard, but I don't really like that idea. >> > The OpenAir format can be made to carry frequencies without violating > the format: the UK airspace file I used at the end of last season merely > appends it to the name: DUXFORD:122.075 and does the same for CTAs too. > > Martin > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Forrester recently released a report on the Return on Investment (ROI) of > Google Apps. They found a 300% ROI, 38%-56% cost savings, and break-even > within 7 months. Over 3 million businesses have gone Google with Google Apps: > an online email calendar, and document program that's accessible from your > browser. Read the Forrester report: http://p.sf.net/sfu/googleapps-sfnew > _______________________________________________ > Xcsoar-user mailing list > Xcsoar-user@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xcsoar-user > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Forrester recently released a report on the Return on Investment (ROI) of Google Apps. They found a 300% ROI, 38%-56% cost savings, and break-even within 7 months. Over 3 million businesses have gone Google with Google Apps: an online email calendar, and document program that's accessible from your browser. Read the Forrester report: http://p.sf.net/sfu/googleapps-sfnew _______________________________________________ Xcsoar-user mailing list Xcsoar-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xcsoar-user
