Hi Tobias,

Yes, strictly speaking you are right about height required approaching
infinity as Mc approaches zero.

I think Simon's suggestion is worth considering though; it does add a
little complexity to the display but to me it appears like it could be
intuitive enough (further, it's relatively consistent with our colour
patterns).

On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Tobias Bieniek <tobias.bien...@gmx.de> wrote:
> I think Martin Kopplow did a good job summarizing the whole issue. It
> is actually what I meant earlier by supplying the engine with both
> numbers for internal calculation. It should be intuitive to use
> without having to think what those numbers actually mean. I guess we
> should check which results are displayed at what position in the
> current state.
>
> As for the original MC=0 issue: I think it should display infinity in
> this case. Our logic right now is that the pilot is only circling if
> below glide path AND mc is set to any value above zero. This leads to
> the "magic" switch at MC=0. It might be easier to understand if we
> assumed that the pilot would always be circling when below glide path
> even with no lift. This would probably lead to a division by zero
> resulting in an infinite amount of height needed due to the wind
> drift. As and easter egg we could obviously calculate the trip around
> the earth though... ;)
>
> @Simon: Nice idea in general, but I think adding even more complexity
> to the final glide bar isn't a good thing. Most people are probably
> already confused by the two bars instead of just one...
>
> Turbo
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure 
contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, 
security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this 
data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
_______________________________________________
Xcsoar-user mailing list
Xcsoar-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xcsoar-user

Reply via email to