Agreed on all counts.
-Evan
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Henrik Bieler <henrik.bie...@gmx.de> wrote:
> In fact on my airfield the former multiple German champion often starts
> his final glide 100m below the glidepath if the airmass is still active
> and gains the rest on the way even in the flatlands.
> In this situation (as Ramy and others wrote before) what is needed is an
> objective value (how many meters am I below GP) is needed. Not an
> estimate based on a hypothetical circling in a lift of a guessed strength.
> This ist THE basic requirement for a glide computer to me.
>
> There are obviously two different opinions on this, but for my part I
> want XCS as a tool to support my decisions. Therefore I prefer "hard"
> values based on as little assumptions as possible.
>
> There must be a choice to switch the new behaviour off. The software
> should be there to support the pilot, not to try to educate him and
> force him to adapt to a specific technique, which are the subject of
> discussion/belief.
>
> Greets Henrik
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure
contains a definitive record of customers, application performance,
security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this
data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
_______________________________________________
Xcsoar-user mailing list
Xcsoar-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xcsoar-user
