Max, thanks for the url. It is indeed handy, but returned 82 matches. Trying to
locate potential new regressions in this list is not that simple. Note that I
was referring only to serious bugs and potential regressions, not every bug
report.
Why sharing serious bugs and potential regressions on this list will be
considered spamming?? I don't expect many of those anyway. I think this is the
right place to share with others issues which may impact others. Otherwise,
perhaps I misunderstood the purpose of this mailing list?
Ramy
>________________________________
> From: Max Kellermann <m...@duempel.org>
>To: Ramy Yanetz <ryan...@yahoo.com>
>Cc: xcsoar-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 12:45 PM
>Subject: Re: [Xcsoar-user] Latest XCS-test on Android fails at startup
>
>On 2012/06/26 21:35, Ramy Yanetz <ryan...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Although this particular report was for the test version, may I suggest to
>> open tickets *and* report the issues on this list for serious bugs and
>> potential regressions, so others will be aware.
>
>No. The bug tracker is the place for bug reports. Please do not spam
>the mailing list with bug reports. They don't belong here.
>
>Anybody who wants to see list of known bugs may set a book mark to the
>bug tracker.
>
>Here's one for you:
>
>http://www.xcsoar.org/trac/query?status=accepted&status=assigned&status=new&status=reopened&type=defect&desc=1&order=changetime
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Xcsoar-user mailing list
Xcsoar-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xcsoar-user
