On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 20:35 +0000, seventh guardian wrote: > >From: David Faure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: [email protected] > >Subject: Re: Unified autostart scripts directory > >Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2005 20:21:21 +0200 > > > >On Tuesday 05 July 2005 13:40, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote: > > > From comments elsewhere in the thread we seam to have the following for > >the > > > different desktops: > > > - KDE > > > $KDEDIRS/Autostart > > > $KDEDIRS/env > > > >Not really. We have ~/.kde/Autostart/ (by default, but it's configurable) > >for the *user* autostart folder (i.e. it's empty by default but users can > >put > >.desktop links, or shellscripts in there). > > > >And $KDEDIRS/share/autostart/ (which means a number of directories) for the > >system autostart, with the features Waldo described. But starting > >KDE-desktop > >apps in other environment doesn't make much sense ;) > > Humm.. yes, I guess you're right on that.. We should focus only on the user > interaction stuff, like starting an im messenger on startup,
Yes. > or opening a > filemanager when a usbdisk is mounted, No - already solved > or even what action to do when a key > is pressed. Another spec all together. I'm not convinced this is at all important. > Things like the "inner guts" of the DM should concern only the DM, and not > even being spec'd at all. Eventually we may want a common interface for starting/stopping and specifying services but for now DM's should just do what they do so we can have more of a basis to define this in the future. > So maybe we should forget (at least for now) about the underlinigng dm's > services&stuff framework, and concentrate only in the "user side" of the > question? Thats where I would like to see the focus end up. There are things there that we need to hash out but for the most part is easy for everyone to agree on. -- John (J5) Palmieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ xdg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
