Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > I've attached a test file with some suggested changes to the systray > spec (as per the thread that was going on). comments sought. anyone? > is there a general agreement this would be good?
The details look good to me... I'm looking forward to getting to implement support for it :) However, I have only one suggestion: > a systray icon conforming to the newer scheme will have either an > property of the atom _NET_SYSTEM_TRAY_ICON_ID and type ATOM, and > format 32 or a property of the atom _NET_SYSTEM_TRAY_ICON_NAME and > type UTF8_STRING on the tray icon window. How about instead of saying "if either of these 2 properties, then assume the client is using the new scheme", we could have a single, authoritative way of saying "this client uses the new scheme". For example, we could put _NET_WM_SYSTRAY_V2 in WM_PROTOCOLS, or perhaps set _NET_WM_SYSTRAY_VERSION (for now, to 2 (type Cardinal format 32) on the systray window. -- Bradley T. Hughes - bhughes at trolltech.com Trolltech AS - Sandakervn. 116, P.O. Box 4332 Nydalen, 0402 Oslo, Norway _______________________________________________ xdg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
