On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 08:34:41 -0500 Matthias Clasen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 18:02 +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > > I've attached a test file with some suggested changes to the systray > > spec (as > > per the thread that was going on). comments sought. anyone? is there a > > general > > agreement this would be good? > > I still think that storing pixel data in properties is ugly as hell, > and Render images would be a much better fit, but since I cannot > convince you that system trays will not play a prominent role on > X terminals in the future, there is probably not much point in > continuing to belabor this point. After all, the EWMH has survived > fine with this ugly wart. the problem is that this would be the first part of ewmh to REQUIRE the xrender extension (that i know of) to work properly. i have major reluctance to base an important spec on a still "in progress" extension. :/ but that is my view - i would like to see other peoples views too - if the majority of peolpe here think requiring xrender pictures is a good way to go - then we have a different case. for now it's just you and me agreeing to disagree :) -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 裸好多 Tokyo, Japan (東京 日本) _______________________________________________ xdg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
