On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 20:15 +0000, Alp Toker wrote: > > I think that these are best kept as individual calls -- it doesn't > imply > round-tripping at all. If using a low-level D-Bus API, calls can be > made > in one go and the replies waited for. There are even languages using > managed D-Bus (and I think libdbus too, do those guys have a Haskell > binding?) that are capable of latency hiding and will do this > automatically. > > Moreover, even if applications don't use a "smart solution" here, one > assumes the programs will only suffer the tiny roundtrip overhead > once, > at start up, and will watch for signals thereafter. > > NAK on this one.
I think I agree with you here. Thanks for the feedback. Richard. _______________________________________________ xdg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
